help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Selby, C.
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Selby, C.
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, N. J.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 155, No. 1, 01 1997, 104-108.

Inhaled salmeterol or oral theophylline in nocturnal asthma?

C Selby, HM Engleman, MF Fitzpatrick, PM Sime, TW Mackay and NJ Douglas
Respiratory Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine (RIE), University of Edinburgh, Royal Infirmary, Scotland, United Kingdom.

Nocturnal cough and wheeze are common in asthma and often treated with beta2 agonists or theophyllines. As nocturnal asthma and these therapies may affect sleep and cognition, we compared 50 microg salmeterol inhaled every 12 h with individually dose-titrated sustained- release oral theophylline on sleep quality and cognitive performance in 15 patients with stable nocturnal asthma (overnight peak expiratory flow rate [PEFR] fall > or = 15%, > or = 1 asthmatic awakening/week) using a double-blind, double-dummy, crossover design with 14-d therapy limbs. Cognitive testing and polysomnography were performed on Nights 13 and 14. Trough plasma theophylline concentration after Night 14 on theophylline was median 11.1 (interquartile range 8.3, 15.2) microg/ml. Overnight PEFR falls were similar [salmeterol 2.3 (0, 10.6), theophylline 3.5 (-0.3, 9.6)%, p = 0.4] but on salmeterol there were more nights without awakenings [median difference 1 (0, 2), p < 0.01], fewer nocturnal arousals [difference -3 (-7, 2) h(-1), p < 0.05] and improved quality of life (p = 0.05). Sleep architecture did not otherwise differ. Visual vigilance improved on salmetrol (p < 0.05), but otherwise daytime cognition was unaffected. There was no patient preference for either therapy. Hence in patients with nocturnal asthma, we demonstrate no major clinical advantage, but a small benefit in sleep quality, quality of life, and daytime cognitive function with salmeterol.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
W. J. Calhoun
Nocturnal Asthma
Chest, March 1, 2003; 123 (2009): 399S - 405S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
M. Cazzola, C. F. Donner, and M. G. Matera
Long acting beta 2 agonists and theophylline in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Thorax, August 1, 1999; 54(8): 730 - 736.
[Full Text]


Home page
ChestHome page
L. Wiegand, C. N. Mende, G. Zaidel, C. W. Zwillich, V. J. Petrocella, S. W. Yancey, and K. A. Rickard
Salmeterol vs Theophylline: Sleep and Efficacy Outcomes in Patients With Nocturnal Asthma
Chest, June 1, 1999; 115(6): 1525 - 1532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. J. MARTIN and S. BANKS-SCHLEGEL
Chronobiology of Asthma
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1998; 158(3): 1002 - 1007.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1997 American Thoracic Society
  ATS 2008 State of the Art Course