help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brochard, L.
Right arrow Articles by Harf, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brochard, L.
Right arrow Articles by Harf, A.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 154, No. 5, 11 1996, 1323-1329.

Efficacy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation using intratracheal insufflation

L Brochard, G Boussignac, S Adnot, C Bertrand, D Isabey and A Harf
INSERM U 296, Service de Reanimation Medicale, Hopital Henri Mondor,Creteil, France.

The effects of constant-flow insufflation (CFI) of air in the trachea at the distal end of a modified endotracheal tube as the sole mode of ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were studied in pigs. The ventilatory effect of CFI (15 +/- 2 L/min) generating a positive pressure of about 10 cm H2O with concomitant chest compression was studied first. In nine sedated, paralyzed animals disconnected from the ventilator, CFI alone did not significantly alter the decrease in PaO2 and the rise in PaCO2 observed during apnea. By contrast, the combination of precordial compression and CFI (CFI-CPR) maintained arterial blood gases over a 4-min period at the level obtained during mechanical ventilation. In the second part of the study, ventricular fibrillation was induced and CFI-CPR was compared with standard CPR using conventional mechanical ventilation during two successive 4-min periods, in random order. Ventilatory parameters were identical in the two situations, whereas hemodynamic parameters were similar or better with CFI-CPR than with standard CPR. Significant differences were observed between standard CPR and CFI-CPR for systolic aortic pressure (72 +/- 22 versus 82 +/- 27 mm Hg, respectively; p < 0.02) and for systolic (322 +/- 216 versus 431 +/- 237 ml/s; p < 0.01) and mean (116 +/- 106 versus 143 +/- 108 ml/s; p < 0.01) common carotid blood flows. The ease of use of CFI together with its beneficial hemodynamic effects suggests that CFI deserves to be investigated further as a mode of ventilation during CPR.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Kleinsasser, K. H. Lindner, A. Schaefer, and A. Loeckinger
Decompression-Triggered Positive-Pressure Ventilation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Improves Pulmonary Gas Exchange and Oxygen Uptake
Circulation, July 16, 2002; 106(3): 373 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
L. BLANCH, T. E. VAN der KLOOT, A. M. YOUNGBLOOD, G. MURIAS, A. NAVEIRA, A. B. ADAMS, P. V. ROMERO, and A. NAHUM
Application of Tracheal Gas Insufflation to Acute Unilateral Lung Injury in an Experimental Model
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 15, 2001; 164(4): 642 - 647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
W. G. Voelckel, K. G. Lurie, T. Zielinski, S. McKnite, P. Plaisance, V. Wenzel, and K. H. Lindner
The Effects of Positive End-Expiratory Pressure During Active Compression Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with the Inspiratory Threshold Valve
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2001; 92(4): 967 - 974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1996 American Thoracic Society