help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Springer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Avital, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Springer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Avital, A.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 154, No. 3, Sep 1996, 665-669.

Comparison of respiratory inductance plethysmography with thoracoabdominal compression in bronchial challenges in infants and young children

C Springer, S Godfrey, D Vilozni, E Bar-Yishay, N Noviski and A Avital
Institute of Pulmonology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.

Respiratory inductance plethysmography measuring thoracoabdominal asynchrony (TAA) has been claimed to be a useful tool for measuring changes in airway resistance in infants. In this study we evaluated the response to methacholine by thoracoabdominal compression and respiratory inductance plethysmography. Seventeen infants (mean age, 13.1 +/- 4.7 mo) with recurrent episodes of cough or wheeze underwent bronchial challenge with inhaled methacholine. Lung function was evaluated by measuring maximal expiratory flow at resting lung volume (VmaxFRC), and the degree of TAA was measured by phase angle (theta). Methacholine was inhaled for 1 min during tidal breathing using increasing doubling concentrations until a fall of at least 40% in VmaxFRC was achieved (final concentration). All infants responded to the final concentration of methacholine by a significant fall in VmaxFRC (from 31 +/- 10 to 12 +/- 5 ml/s/kg, p < 0.001). All but one infant responded to methacholine at the final concentration with a significant increase in phase angle (median theta increased from 11.7 to 31.7 degrees, p < 0.001). In two other infants there was an early response in theta compared with the response in VmaxFRC. Phase angle increase after methacholine was expressed as Z-scores (the difference between postmethacholine theta and postbuffer theta divided by the standard deviation of postbuffer theta). An increase of at least 2.0 Z- scores in theta was observed at the same concentration of methacholine when VmaxFRC fell by at least 40% in 15 of the 17 infants (88%). We conclude that respiratory inductance plethysmography is a sensitive method to measure bronchial reactivity to methacholine in most of the infants studied (14 of 17, 82%). A concentration of methacholine causing an increase in theta of at least 2.0 standard deviations above baseline is equivalent to the concentration causing a 40% fall in VmaxFRC.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
N. Beydon, S. D. Davis, E. Lombardi, J. L. Allen, H. G. M. Arets, P. Aurora, H. Bisgaard, G. M. Davis, F. M. Ducharme, H. Eigen, et al.
An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: Pulmonary Function Testing in Preschool Children
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2007; 175(12): 1304 - 1345.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
J. Palmer, J. Allen, and O. Mayer
Tidal Breathing Analysis
NeoReviews, May 1, 2004; 5(5): e186 - e193.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. E. Courtney, K. H. Pyon, J. G. Saslow, G. K. Arnold, P. B. Pandit, and R. H. Habib
Lung Recruitment and Breathing Pattern During Variable Versus Continuous Flow Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Premature Infants: An Evaluation of Three Devices
Pediatrics, February 1, 2001; 107(2): 304 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1996 American Thoracic Society