help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pare, P. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moore, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pare, P. D.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 154, No. 3, Sep 1996, 642-648.

Shape and position of the complete dose-response curve for inhaled methacholine in normal subjects

BJ Moore, CC Hilliam, LM Verburgt, BR Wiggs, S Vedal and PD Pare
University of British Columbia Pulmonary Research Laboratory, St. Paul's Hospital, Canada.

Plateaus on the inhalation concentration-response curve have been described in normal subjects and patients with mild asthma. To determine the prevalence of plateaus on inhalation concentration- response curves, and the position of the curves in normal subjects, we measured complete dose-response curves for methacholine (1 mg/ml to 256 mg/ml) in 73 nonatopic, nonsmoking, nonasthmatic normal subjects between the ages of 20 and 76 yr. Measurements included FEV1, maximal expiratory flow at 50% and 30% of vital capacity on partial and complete forced expiratory flow-volume curves (Vmax50p, Vmax50c, Vmax30p, Vmax30c) and pulmonary resistance (RL). Plateau responses, EC50 values and slopes were measured. Plateaus were present in 25, 27, 24, 34, 35, and 16 subjects for FEV1, Vmax50c, Vmax30c, Vmax50p, Vmax30p, and RL, respectively. In those who achieved a plateau, the mean maximal decrease in FEV1 (+/- SD) was 21 +/- 8%, in Vmax50c it was 46 +/- 16%, in Vmax50p it was 67 +/- 12%, in Vmax30c it was 58 +/- 21%, and in Vmax30p it was 75 +/- 15%, and the increase in RL was 213 +/- 89%. In summary, the results of this study showed that easily identifiable plateaus develop on the inhalation concentration-response curves of approximately 40% of normal subjects after only moderate decreases in maximum flow and increases in RL. Maximal response at the plateau was greater on partial flow-volume curves and at lower lung volumes (30% versus 50% of VC). Comparison of these data with data from patients at risk for airway hyperresponsiveness will allow definition of the mechanisms leading to airway hyperresponsiveness.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. J. Lai-Fook, P. K. Houtz, and Y.-L. Lai
End-expiratory and tidal volumes measured in conscious mice using single projection x-ray images
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2008; 104(2): 521 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. A. Affonce and K. R. Lutchen
New perspectives on the mechanical basis for airway hyperreactivity and airway hypersensitivity in asthma
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2006; 101(6): 1710 - 1719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. K. Lambert and T. A. Wilson
Smooth muscle dynamics and maximal expiratory flow in asthma
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2005; 99(5): 1885 - 1890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
G.G. King, J.D. Carroll, N.L. Muller, K.P. Whittall, M. Gao, Y. Nakano, and P.D. Pare
Heterogeneity of narrowing in normal and asthmatic airways measured by HRCT
Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2004; 24(2): 211 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. H. Brown and W. Mitzner
Invited Review: Understanding airway pathophysiology with computed tomograpy
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2003; 95(2): 854 - 862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. E. McParland, P. T. Macklem, and P. D. Pare
Airway wall remodeling: friend or foe?
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2003; 95(1): 426 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
P. B. Noble, D. J. Turner, and H. W. Mitchell
Relationship of airway narrowing, compliance, and cartilage in isolated bronchial segments
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2002; 92(3): 1119 - 1124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. H. Brown and W. Mitzner
Airway closure with high PEEP in vivo
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2000; 89(3): 956 - 960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. M. OPAZO SAEZ, C. Y. SEOW, and P. D. PARE
Peripheral Airway Smooth Muscle Mechanics in Obstructive Airways Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2000; 161(3): 910 - 917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
R. H. Brown and W. Mitzner
The myth of maximal airway responsiveness in vivo
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 1998; 85(6): 2012 - 2017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
B. J. MOORE, G. G. KING, Y. D'YACHKOVA, H. R. AHMAD, and P. D. PARE
Mechanism of Methacholine Dose-Response Plateaus in Normal Subjects
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 1998; 158(2): 666 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
B. J. MOORE, L. M. VERBURGT, G. G. KING, and P. D. PARE
The Effect of Deep Inspiration on Methacholine Dose-response Curves in Normal Subjects
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 1997; 156(4): 1278 - 1281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1996 American Thoracic Society