help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Henry, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Henry, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, J. M.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 154, No. 2, Aug 1996, 366-375.

Ultrasonic nebulized in comparison with instilled surfactant treatment of preterm lambs

MD Henry, CM Rebello, M Ikegami, AH Jobe, EG Langenback and JM Davis
Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance 90502, USA.

To evaluate the efficiency and distribution of ultrasonic nebulized versus instilled surfactant in the treatment of surfactant deficiency at varying degrees of maturation, twin or triplet lamb fetuses were delivered at 125 to 137 d gestational age and received nebulized natural surfactant (Neb Only), instilled surfactant followed by a second instilled dose (Inst/Inst), instilled surfactant followed by nebulized surfactant (Inst/Neb), or no surfactant (Control). The lambs were ventilated for 6 h. Twenty-eight lambs were categorized into two groups (low compliance versus moderate compliance) based on initial physiologic lung characteristics. Efficiency of deposition of nebulized surfactant directly correlated with the compliances and ventilatory efficiency indices measured at 15 min of age. The low-compliance group (Low Comp) had significantly lower efficiency of surfactant deposition (7.6 +/- 1.6%) than did the moderate-compliance group (Mod Comp) (23.4 +/- 2.5%) (p < 0.01). Overall, instilled surfactant had a reasonably homogeneous distribution, whereas nebulized surfactant had a less homogeneous distribution, except for the Low Comp, Inst/Neb group, which had a distribution pattern similar to that for instilled surfactant. The potential for nebulized surfactant therapy for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) may be limited by the nonhomogeneous nature of ventilation in the preterm lung.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
R. T. Schermuly, A. Gunther, M. Ermert, L. Ermert, H. A. Ghofrani, N. Weissmann, F. Grimminger, W. Seeger, and D. Walmrath
Conebulization of surfactant and urokinase restores gas exchange in perfused lungs with alveolar fibrin formation
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, April 1, 2001; 280(4): L792 - L800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. T. SCHERMULY, A. GÜNTHER, N. WEISSMANN, H. A. GHOFRANI, W. SEEGER, F. GRIMMINGER, and D. WALMRATH
Differential Impact of Ultrasonically Nebulized Versus Tracheal-instilled Surfactant on Ventilation-Perfusion (VA/Q) Mismatch in a Model of Acute Lung Injury
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2000; 161(1): 152 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
V. BALARAMAN, J. MEISTER, T. L. KU, S. L. SOOD, E. TAM, J. KILLEEN, C. F. T. UYEHARA, E. EGAN, and D. EASA
Lavage Administration of Dilute Surfactants after Acute Lung Injury in Neonatal Piglets
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 1998; 158(1): 12 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. SCHERMULY, T. SCHMEHL, A. GÜNTHER, F. GRIMMINGER, W. SEEGER, and D. WALMRATH
Ultrasonic Nebulization for Efficient Delivery of Surfactant in a Model of Acute Lung Injury . Impact on Gas Exchange
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 1, 1997; 156(2): 445 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1996 American Thoracic Society