Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 153, No. 5, May 1996, 1591-1599.
Home versus intensive care pressure support devices. Experimental and clinical comparison
F Lofaso, L Brochard, T Hang, H Lorino, A Harf and D Isabey
Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale INSERM U 296, Services de Physiologie-Explorations Fonctionnelles et de Reanimation Medicale, Hopital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France.
A bench study using an artificial lung model and a clinical study in
patients were performed to evaluate six commercially available home
pressure support devices. Six devices were tested in the in vitro study,
including five designed for home use and one designed for use in intensive
care units. Minimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) varied across
home devices, from 0.5 cm H2O to 4.3 cm H2O. Work imposed during exhalation
varied up to six-fold across devices. A substantial rebreathing volume has
present for the three home devices with a common inspiratory and expiratory
line. This rebreathing volume decreased with increasing PEEP level, as
expected, but remained substantial at the widely used PEEP level of 5 cm
H2O. Use of a non-rebreathing valve increased both the work imposed by the
circuit during the exhalation phase and the time required to attain the
relaxation equilibrium. Except for two home devices and a bilevel positive
airway pressure (BiPAP) device equipped with a non-rebreathing valve,
differences in inspiratory trigger sensitivities were small between home
and intensive care devices. During pressure support, the total work
performed by the machines did not differ by more than 15% between devices,
whereas differences of more than 300% were observed in flow acceleration.
Only one home device gave a flow acceleration similar to or better than
that obtained with the intensive care device. In a randomized, crossover
clinical study, we compared a home device to a device specially designed
for intensive care use in seven intubated patients during weaning from
mechanical ventilation. The main differences between the two devices were
trigger sensitivity and initial flow acceleration. For the same level of
pressure support, there were no significant differences in arterial PCO2,
tidal volume, respiratory rate, or minute ventilation between these two
devices. However, the esophageal pressure- time product was 30% higher with
the home device (165 +/- 93 versus 119 +/- 80 cm H2O/min, p < 0.05). In
conclusion, differences exist between devices in terms of occurrence of
rebreathing, speed of attainment of stable pressure support level, and
expiratory resistance. These differences characterizing the delivery of
pressure support may have clinical impact on the inspiratory effort of
patients.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Gonzalez-Bermejo, V. Laplanche, F. E. Husseini, A. Duguet, J-P. Derenne, and T. Similowski
Evaluation of the user-friendliness of 11 home mechanical ventilators
Eur. Respir. J.,
June 1, 2006;
27(6):
1236 - 1243.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Miyoshi, Y. Fujino, A. Uchiyama, T. Mashimo, and M. Nishimura
Effects of Gas Leak on Triggering Function, Humidification, and Inspiratory Oxygen Fraction During Noninvasive Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation
Chest,
November 1, 2005;
128(5):
3691 - 3698.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R Agarwal, A N Aggarwal, D Gupta, and S K Jindal
Non-invasive ventilation in acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema
Postgrad. Med. J.,
October 1, 2005;
81(960):
637 - 643.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Battisti, D. Tassaux, J.-P. Janssens, J.-B. Michotte, S. Jaber, and P. Jolliet
Performance Characteristics of 10 Home Mechanical Ventilators in Pressure-Support Mode: A Comparative Bench Study
Chest,
May 1, 2005;
127(5):
1784 - 1792.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Fauroux, F. Nicot, S. Essouri, N. Hart, A. Clement, M.I. Polkey, and F. Lofaso
Setting of noninvasive pressure support in young patients with cystic fibrosis
Eur. Respir. J.,
October 1, 2004;
24(4):
624 - 630.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.W. Elliott
The interface: crucial for successful noninvasive ventilation
Eur. Respir. J.,
January 1, 2004;
23(1):
7 - 8.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Sharshar, G. Desmarais, B. Louis, G. Macadou, R. Porcher, A. Harf, J.-C. Raphael, D. Isabey, and F. Lofaso
Transdiaphragmatic Pressure Control of Airway Pressure Support in Healthy Subjects
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
October 1, 2003;
168(7):
760 - 769.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Liesching, H. Kwok, and N. S. Hill
Acute Applications of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation
Chest,
August 1, 2003;
124(2):
699 - 713.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.P. Highcock, J.M. Shneerson, and I.E. Smith
Increased ventilation with NiIPPV does not necessarily improve exercise capacity in COPD
Eur. Respir. J.,
July 1, 2003;
22(1):
100 - 105.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Vitacca, L. Barbano, S. D'Anna, R. Porta, L. Bianchi, and N. Ambrosino
Comparison of Five Bilevel Pressure Ventilators in Patients With Chronic Ventilatory Failure: A Physiologic Study
Chest,
December 1, 2002;
122(6):
2105 - 2114.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.P. Highcock, E. Morrish, S. Jamieson, J.M. Shneerson, and I.E. Smith
An overnight comparison of two ventilators used in the treatment of chronic respiratory failure
Eur. Respir. J.,
October 1, 2002;
20(4):
942 - 945.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Schonhofer and S. Sortor-Leger
Equipment needs for noninvasive mechanical ventilation
Eur. Respir. J.,
October 1, 2002;
20(4):
1029 - 1036.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. E. Johnson, D. J. Gavin, and S. Adams-Dramiga
Effects of Training With Heliox and Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation on Exercise Ability in Patients With Severe COPD*
Chest,
August 1, 2002;
122(2):
464 - 472.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. S. Hill, C. Carlisle, and N. R. Kramer
Effect of a Nonrebreathing Exhalation Valve on Long-term Nasal Ventilation Using a Bilevel Device*
Chest,
July 1, 2002;
122(1):
84 - 91.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. Highcock, I. E. Smith, and J. M. Shneerson
The Effect of Noninvasive Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation During Exercise in Severe Scoliosis*
Chest,
May 1, 2002;
121(5):
1555 - 1560.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure
Thorax,
March 1, 2002;
57(3):
192 - 211.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. M. STELL, G. PAUL, K. C. LEE, J. PONTE, and J. MOXHAM
Noninvasive Ventilator Triggering in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease . A Test Lung Comparison
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
December 1, 2001;
164(11):
2092 - 2097.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Wysocki and M. Antonelli
Noninvasive mechanical ventilation in acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure
Eur. Respir. J.,
July 1, 2001;
18(1):
209 - 220.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.P. Highcock, J.M. Shneerson, and I.E. Smith
Functional differences in bi-level pressure preset ventilators
Eur. Respir. J.,
February 1, 2001;
17(2):
268 - 273.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. MEHTA and N. S. HILL
Noninvasive Ventilation
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
February 1, 2001;
163(2):
540 - 577.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. FAUROUX, E. ITTI, J. PIGEOT, D. ISABEY, M. MEIGNAN, G. FERRY, F. LOFASO, J.-M. WILLEMOT, A. CLÉMENT, and A. HARF
Optimization of Aerosol Deposition by Pressure Support in Children with Cystic Fibrosis . An Experimental and Clinical Study
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
December 1, 2000;
162(6):
2265 - 2271.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Vitacca, S. Nava, M. Confalonieri, L. Bianchi, R. Porta, E. Clini, and N. Ambrosino
The Appropriate Setting of Noninvasive Pressure Support Ventilation in Stable COPD Patients
Chest,
November 1, 2000;
118(5):
1286 - 1293.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Miyoshi, Y. Fujino, T. Mashimo, and M. Nishimura
Performance of Transport Ventilator With Patient-Triggered Ventilation
Chest,
October 1, 2000;
118(4):
1109 - 1115.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-L. Diehl, D. Isabey, G. Desmarais, L. Brochard, A. Harf, and F. Lofaso
Physiological effects of alveolar, tracheal, and "standard" pressure supports
J Appl Physiol,
July 1, 1999;
87(1):
428 - 437.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Fauroux, D. Isabey, G. Desmarais, L. Brochard, A. Harf, and F. Lofaso
Nonchemical influence of inspiratory pressure support on inspiratory activity in humans
J Appl Physiol,
December 1, 1998;
85(6):
2169 - 2175.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Nava, M. Confalonieri, and C. Rampulla
Intermediate respiratory intensive care units in Europe: a European perspective
Thorax,
September 1, 1998;
53(9):
798 - 802.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Hillberg and D. C. Johnson
Noninvasive Ventilation
N. Engl. J. Med.,
December 11, 1997;
337(24):
1746 - 1752.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. ASLANIAN, S. E. ATROUS, D. ISABEY, E. VALENTE, D. CORSI, A. HARF, F. LEMAIRE, and L. BROCHARD
Effects of Flow Triggering on Breathing Effort During Partial Ventilatory Support
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
January 1, 1997;
157(1):
135 - 143.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 American Thoracic Society
|
|
|