help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pasterkamp, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sanchez, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pasterkamp, H.
Right arrow Articles by Sanchez, I.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 153, No. 3, Mar 1996, 1087-1092.

Effect of gas density on respiratory sounds

H Pasterkamp and I Sanchez
Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

The generation of normal lung sounds by turbulent air flow has been questioned because gas density appears to have only a minor effect. We studied whether gas density has a greater influence on lung sounds at higher frequencies than traditionally measured. Six healthy adult men breathed air followed by a mixture of 80% helium and 20% oxygen (He-O2) at a target flow of 1.5 L/s. Flow and sounds at the trachea and posterior right lower lobe were simultaneously acquired by computer. Fourier analysis was applied to sounds at target flow +/- 0.2 L/s. Average power spectra were computed for each recording site, respiratory phase, and respired gas. He-O2 reduced the power of inspiratory lung sounds below 300 Hz by only 1.7 +/- 1.5 dB whereas power between 300 and 600 Hz was reduced by 4.6 +/- 1.4 dB (p<0.05). Tracheal sound power was reduced less consistently but all subjects showed an upward frequency shift in power maxima on He-O2, similar to formant shifts observed in helium speech. Our findings suggest that flow turbulence is the major determinant of lung sounds at higher frequencies. Current instruments for auscultation and recording of respiratory sounds may have to be modified to optimize their response in this higher frequency range.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
H. Kiyokawa and H. Pasterkamp
Volume-dependent variations of regional lung sound, amplitude, and phase
J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2002; 93(3): 1030 - 1038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
H. PASTERKAMP, S. S. KRAMAN, and G. R. WODICKA
Respiratory Sounds . Advances Beyond the Stethoscope
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1997; 156(3): 974 - 987.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1996 American Thoracic Society