help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kress, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kress, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, J. B.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 153, No. 3, Mar 1996, 1012-1018.

Sedation of critically ill patients during mechanical ventilation. A comparison of propofol and midazolam

JP Kress, MF O'Connor, AS Pohlman, D Olson, A Lavoie, A Toledano and JB Hall
University of Chicago, Department of Medicine, Illinois 60637, USA.

Propofol (P) and midazolam (M) are frequently given by continuous infusion for sedation in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. We compared these drugs with regard to: (1) time-to-awaken; (2) reproducibility of bedside assessments of level of sedation; (3) time-to-sedation; and (4) change in oxygen consumption (V O2) from awake to sedated state. Seventy-three patients were prospectively randomized to receive either P (n=37) or M (n=36). Wake-up times after stopping the drug were assessed by blinded and unblinded observers, by asking patients to perform simple tasks. Times to sedate were assessed by consensus agreement among nurses and investigators. Demographics and APACHE II scores were not different between P and M. The P group had a significantly narrower range of wake-up times with a higher likelihood of waking in less than 60 min. Blinded versus unblinded observations had excellent correlation. Average time to sedate and decrease in V O2 were not different. We conclude that in this patient population: (1) both P and M achieved optimal sedation in a large fraction of patients when administered by specified dosing protocols; (2) P had a faster, more reliable, wake-up time; (3) assessments of time-to-awaken were objective and reproducible; (4) time to sedation was not significantly different; (5) V O2 decreased similarly with both.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
D. Frankenfield
Energy Expenditure and Protein Requirements After Traumatic Injury
Nutr Clin Pract, October 1, 2006; 21(5): 430 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
B. D Watson and S. L Kane-Gill
Sedation Assessment in Critically Ill Adults: 2001-2004 Update
Ann. Pharmacother., November 1, 2004; 38(11): 1898 - 1906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
E. R. McFadden Jr.
Acute Severe Asthma
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2003; 168(7): 740 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. P. Kress, A. S. Pohlman, and J. B. Hall
Sedation and Analgesia in the Intensive Care Unit
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 15, 2002; 166(8): 1024 - 1028.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
H. M. Soliman, C. Melot, and J.-L. Vincent
Sedative and analgesic practice in the intensive care unit: the results of a European survey
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2001; 87(2): 186 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Tung, J. P. Lynch, and W. B. Mendelson
Prolonged Sedation with Propofol in the Rat Does Not Result in Sleep Deprivation
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2001; 92(5): 1232 - 1236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
R. I. Hall, D. Sandham, P. Cardinal, M. Tweeddale, D. Moher, X. Wang, and A. H. Anis
Propofol vs Midazolam for ICU Sedation : A Canadian Multicenter Randomized Trial
Chest, April 1, 2001; 119(4): 1151 - 1159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
B. Walder, N. Elia, I. Henzi, J. R. Romand, and M. R. Tramer
A Lack of Evidence of Superiority of Propofol Versus Midazolam for Sedation in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: A Qualitative and Quantitative Systematic Review
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2001; 92(4): 975 - 983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. P. Kress, A. S. Pohlman, M. F. O'Connor, and J. B. Hall
Daily Interruption of Sedative Infusions in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation
N. Engl. J. Med., May 18, 2000; 342(20): 1471 - 1477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. E. Ostermann, S. P. Keenan, R. A. Seiferling, and W. J. Sibbald
Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review
JAMA, March 15, 2000; 283(11): 1451 - 1459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. P. KRESS, A. S. POHLMAN, J. ALVERDY, and J. B. HALL
The Impact of Morbid Obesity on Oxygen Cost of Breathing (VO2RESP) at Rest
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1999; 160(3): 883 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1996 American Thoracic Society