help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coates, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Demizio, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coates, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Demizio, D. L.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 152, No. 3, Sep 1995, 942-946.

The simplified version of Boyle's Law leads to errors in the measurement of thoracic gas volume

AL Coates, KJ Desmond and DL Demizio
Division of Respiratory Medicine, Montreal Children's Hospital-McGill University Research Institute, Quebec, Canada.

When using Boyle's Law for thoracic gas volume (Vtg) measurement, it is generally assumed that the alveolar pressure (Palv) does not differ from barometric pressure (Pbar) at the start of rarefaction and compression and that the product of the change in volume and pressure (delta P x delta V) is negligibly small. In a gentle panting maneuver in which the difference between Palv and Pbar is small, errors introduced by these assumptions are likely to be small; however, this is not the case when Vtg is measured using a single vigorous inspiratory effort. Discrepancies in the Vtg between the "complex" version of Boyle's Law, which does not ignore delta P x delta V and accounts for large swings in Palv, and the "simplified" version, during both a panting maneuver and a single inspiratory effort were calculated for normal control subjects and patients with cystic fibrosis or asthma. Defining the Vtg from the complete version as "correct," the errors introduced by the simplified version ranged from -3 to +3% for the panting maneuver whereas they ranged from 2 to 9% for the inspiratory maneuver. Using the simplified equation, the Vtg for the inspiratory maneuver was 0.135 +/- 0.237 L greater (p < 0.02) than for the panting maneuver. This discrepancy disappeared when the complete equation was used. While the errors introduced by the use of the simplified version of Boyle's Law are small, they are systematic and unnecessary.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1995 American Thoracic Society