S Quirce, G Contreras, A Dybuncio and M Chan-Yeung
Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Canada.

This is a study of the reliability of peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring using a portable computerized peak flow meter, the VMX Mini- log, in 17 subjects referred for suspected occupational asthma. Subjects were requested to monitor their PEF six times daily using the VMX Mini-Log for 2 wk at work and at least 10 d away from work. They were unaware that their readings were stored by the flow meter in addition to the digital readout. Four subjects (22%) were unable to complete the monitoring. The results recorded by the subjects were compared with the results recorded by the VMX. Of those who completed the monitoring, only 55.3% of the records were completely accurate in terms of the value and the timing of the measurements, 23.3% were inaccurate either in terms of the recorded value or of the timing of the measurement, and the remainder were fabricated results (not recorded by the Mini-Log). Our results suggest that PEF monitoring using ordinary peak flow meters for assessment of work-relatedness of asthma has limitations and is not reliable.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Fonseca, A. Costa-Pereira, L. Delgado, L. N. Silva, M. Magalhaes, M. G. Castel-Branco, and M. Vaz Pulmonary Function Electronic Monitoring Devices: A Randomized Agreement Study Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1258 - 1265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P J Nicholson, P Cullinan, A J Newman Taylor, P S Burge, and C Boyle Evidence based guidelines for the prevention, identification, and management of occupational asthma Occup. Environ. Med., May 1, 2005; 62(5): 290 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Holcroft, E. A. Eisen, S. R. Sama, and D. H. Wegman Measurement Characteristics of Peak Expiratory Flow Chest, August 1, 2003; 124(2): 501 - 510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Moscato, J-L. Malo, and D. Bernstein Diagnosing occupational asthma: how, how much, how far? Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2003; 21(5): 879 - 885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D R Baldwin, P Gannon, P Bright, D T Newton, A Robertson, K Venables, B Graneek, R D Barker, A Cartier, J-L Malo, et al. Interpretation of occupational peak flow records: level of agreement between expert clinicians and Oasys-2 Thorax, October 1, 2002; 57(10): 860 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E Meijer, D E Grobbee, and D Heederik Detection of workers sensitised to high molecular weight allergens: a diagnostic study in laboratory animal workers Occup. Environ. Med., March 1, 2002; 59(3): 189 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Provocative factors in asthma Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 1, 1999; 161(90111): s8 - 14. [Full Text]

				N. KÜNZLI, E. Z. STUTZ, A. P. PERRUCHOUD, O. BRÄNDLI, J.-M. TSCHOPP, G. BOLOGNINI, W. KARRER, C. SCHINDLER, U. ACKERMANN-LIEBRICH, and P. LEUENBERGER Peak Flow Variability in the SAPALDIA Study and Its Validity in Screening for Asthma-related Conditions Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 1999; 160(2): 427 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				M. Schenker Respiratory Health Hazards in Agriculture Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 1, 1998; 158(2007): S1 - S76. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. TIMONEN, J. NIELSEN, J. SCHWARTZ, A. GOTTI, V. VONDRA, C. GRATZIOU, P. G. AeVER, W. ROEMER, and B. BRUNEKREEF Chronic Respiratory Symptoms, Skin Test Results, and Lung Function as Predictors of Peak Flow Variability Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1997; 156(3): 776 - 782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]