GE D'Alonzo, VW Steinijans and A Keller
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.

Peak expiratory flow rate (PEF) or forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) monitoring is an important clinical tool to assess the degree of 24-h variation (circadian) in lung function, which correlates with the degree of airway hyperresponsiveness. Ideally, PEF measurements should be taken frequently during the 24-h period to reflect the true variability. In practice, however, measurements are generally taken twice daily, usually upon arising and in the evening before bedtime. The effect of reducing the frequency of lung function measurement on the reported 24-h time average (mesor) and the circadian variability were evaluated. Four measurements taken 8 h apart and two measurements derived upon arising and the other, either 12 h later or before retiring, were compared with the full 24-h lung function profile, which included thirteen 2-hourly measurements. Based on the data from a 24-h lung function study in 20 adult patients with asthma, the corresponding values were separately compared at baseline and under two theophylline treatments, one being administered twice daily and the other once daily. The results are as follows: Whereas the 24-h time average (mesor) is hardly effected by the reduced measurements schemes, variability was grossly underestimated. Only 60 to 80% of the actual variability is picked up in the case of the four 8-hourly measurements, and only 20 to 45% in the case of the two measurements. The loss of accuracy in assessing 24-h airflow variability has potentially important implications on clinical practice and the investigation of therapeutics in asthma.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M R Miller The PEF data plot: planning to get the message Thorax, February 1, 2005; 60(2): 91 - 92. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. J. Hunter, C. E. Brightling, G. Woltmann, A. J. Wardlaw, and I. D. Pavord A Comparison of the Validity of Different Diagnostic Tests in Adults With Asthma* Chest, April 1, 2002; 121(4): 1051 - 1057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. SPENGLER and S. A. SHEA Endogenous Circadian Rhythm of Pulmonary Function in Healthy Humans Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2000; 162(3): 1038 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				N. KÜNZLI, E. Z. STUTZ, A. P. PERRUCHOUD, O. BRÄNDLI, J.-M. TSCHOPP, G. BOLOGNINI, W. KARRER, C. SCHINDLER, U. ACKERMANN-LIEBRICH, and P. LEUENBERGER Peak Flow Variability in the SAPALDIA Study and Its Validity in Screening for Asthma-related Conditions Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 1999; 160(2): 427 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				H. Reddel, C. Jenkins, and A. Woolcock Diurnal variability---time to change asthma guidelines? BMJ, July 3, 1999; 319(7201): 45 - 47. [Full Text]

				P F G Gannon, D T Newton, C F A Pantin, and P S Burge Effect of the number of peak expiratory flow readings per day on the estimation of diurnal variation Thorax, September 1, 1998; 53(9): 790 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. Dirksen, N.-H. Holstein-Rathlou, F. Madsen, L. T. Skovgaard, C. S. Ulrik, T. Heckscher, and A. Kok-Jensen Long-range correlations of serial FEV1 measurements in emphysematous patients and normal subjects J Appl Physiol, July 1, 1998; 85(1): 259 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. TIMONEN, J. NIELSEN, J. SCHWARTZ, A. GOTTI, V. VONDRA, C. GRATZIOU, P. G. AeVER, W. ROEMER, and B. BRUNEKREEF Chronic Respiratory Symptoms, Skin Test Results, and Lung Function as Predictors of Peak Flow Variability Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1997; 156(3): 776 - 782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]