help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hankinson, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Das, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hankinson, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Das, M. K.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 152, No. 2, Aug 1995, 702-706.

Frequency response of portable PEF meters

JL Hankinson and MK Das
Division of Respiratory Disease Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.

Peak expiratory flow (PEF) is a dynamic parameter and therefore requires a measuring device with a high-frequency response. This study evaluated the frequency-response characteristics of eight commercially available PEF meters, using simulated forced-expiratory maneuvers with a computer-controlled mechanical pump. Three different PEF levels were used (200, 400, and 600 L/min) at six levels of harmonic-frequency content similar to those observed in human subjects. For waveforms with higher frequency content (at the high end or above the physiologic range), the Assess, Vitalograph, Pocket Peak, and Spir-O-Flow PEF meters all overread PEF (greater than 15% difference from target values) at all three PEF levels. These results suggest that the frequency response of PEF meters is an important consideration in the selection of such meters and should be included in device requirements. The current practice of using various levels of American Thoracic Society (ATS) waveform 24 with its low-frequency content may not adequately evaluate the frequency characteristics of PEF meters. An upper range (5% of the fundamental frequency) of 12 Hz, within the range observed in normal subjects, appears to be more practical than an upper limit of 20 Hz.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
J. W. Stout, C. M. Visness, P. Enright, C. Lamm, G. Shapiro, V. N. Gan, G. K. Adams III, and H. E. Mitchell
Classification of Asthma Severity in Children: The Contribution of Pulmonary Function Testing
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, August 1, 2006; 160(8): 844 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. A. Holcroft, E. A. Eisen, S. R. Sama, and D. H. Wegman
Measurement Characteristics of Peak Expiratory Flow
Chest, August 1, 2003; 124(2): 501 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1995 American Thoracic Society