help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brienza, N.
Right arrow Articles by Robotham, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brienza, N.
Right arrow Articles by Robotham, J. L.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 152, No. 2, Aug 1995, 504-510.

Effects of PEEP on liver arterial and venous blood flows

N Brienza, JP Revelly, T Ayuse and JL Robotham
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21287-4965, USA.

Total venous return decreases with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). It is likely that the liver plays an important role in this response, either through the development of an increase in venous resistance or through an increase in the venous backpressure at the outflow end of the liver. In addition, hepatic arterial flow is reported to be selectively decreased by the application of PEEP. Therefore, to clarify the effects of PEEP on liver hemodynamics, we generated pressure-flow (P-Q) relationships in both liver vascular beds of anesthetized, mechanically ventilated pigs at PEEP of 0, 5, 10, and 15 cm H2O to obtain values of backpressure (Pback, mm Hg) from linear extrapolation of the P-Q relationships and resistance (mm Hg/ml/min/kg) from its slope. PEEP decreased portal vein flow (Qpv) and caused an increase in the liver venous resistance (from 0.08 +/- 0.01 to 0.16 +/- 0.02 mm Hg/ml/min/kg; p < 0.05). Ppvback and right atrial pressure (Pra) increased equally (from 5.1 +/- 0.3 to 9.9 +/- 0.4 mm Hg, p < 0.05, and from 4.0 +/- 0.2 to 8.6 +/- 0.5 mm Hg, p < 0.05, respectively, at PEEP 15). The reduction in portal venous flow was related to an increase in the backpressure to flow (as a result of an increase in Pra) and to an increase in liver venous resistances that may cause blood pooling in the splanchnic compartment and decrease venous return through the liver. PEEP increased Phaback (from 11.2 +/- 0.9 to 14.5 +/- 0.7 mm Hg at PEEP 15, p < 0.05) but did not change hepatic arterial resistance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
N. Soni and P. Williams
Positive pressure ventilation: what is the real cost?
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2008; 101(4): 446 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
S. M. Jakob, J. J. Tenhunen, S. Laitinen, A. Heino, E. Alhava, and J. Takala
Effects of systemic arterial hypoperfusion on splanchnic hemodynamics and hepatic arterial buffer response in pigs
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2001; 280(5): G819 - G827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. M. Mutlu, E. A. Mutlu, and P. Factor
GI Complications in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation
Chest, April 1, 2001; 119(4): 1222 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
H. Jellinek, H. Krenn, W. Oczenski, F. Veit, S. Schwarz, and R. D. Fitzgerald
Influence of positive airway pressure on the pressure gradient for venous return in humans
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2000; 88(3): 926 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. S. Blevins, M. J. Connolly, and D. E. Carlson
Baroreceptor-mediated compensation for hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 1999; 86(1): 285 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1995 American Thoracic Society
  ATS Par News