DA Pevernagie, AW Stanson, PF Sheedy 2nd, BK Daniels and JW Shepard Jr
Sleep Disorders Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

Fast-CT scanning was used to study the effects of changes in body position on upper airway (UA) size and shape in 11 awake subjects with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Six patients with position (P)-dependent OSA were compared with five patients with nonposition (NP)-dependent OSA. Scans were repeated in the prone (PRN), right side (RS), and supine (SUP) body positions at both functional residual capacity and end-inspiratory tidal volume. Significant group, group by position, and borderline group by respiration effects were detected for minimum but not mean UA dimension data. Significant differences between groups were noted in minimum cross-sectional area and minimum lateral distance but not in minimum anteroposterior distance in the RS and SUP positions. Turning from the PRN to the RS or SUP position tended to decrease UA size in the NP group by decreasing the lateral distance, while the opposite effect was found in the P group. The results indicate that changes in body position during wakefulness affect the lateral but not the anteroposterior dimensions of the UA, and the UA behaves differently in patients with NP and P OSA in response to changes in body position.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M P Swanney, G Ruppel, P L Enright, O F Pedersen, R O Crapo, M R Miller, R L Jensen, E Falaschetti, J P Schouten, J L Hankinson, et al. Using the lower limit of normal for the FEV1/FVC ratio reduces the misclassification of airway obstruction Thorax, December 1, 2008; 63(12): 1046 - 1051. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Boudewyns, M. Marklund, and W. Hochban Alternatives for OSAHS treatment: selection of patients for upper airway surgery and oral appliances Eur. Respir. Rev., December 1, 2007; 16(106): 132 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Buyse and the participants of working group 2 Treatment effects of sleep apnoea: where are we now? Eur. Respir. Rev., December 1, 2007; 16(106): 146 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. F. Mansour, J. A. Rowley, and M. S. Badr Measurement of pharyngeal cross-sectional area by finite element analysis J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2006; 100(1): 294 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Marklund, H. Stenlund, and K. A. Franklin Mandibular Advancement Devices in 630 Men and Women With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Snoring: Tolerability and Predictors of Treatment Success Chest, April 1, 2004; 125(4): 1270 - 1278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Series and I. Marc Importance of sleep stage- and body position-dependence of sleep apnoea in determining benefits to auto-CPAP therapy Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2001; 18(1): 170 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Malhotra, G. Pillar, R. Fogel, J. Beauregard, J. Edwards, and D. P. White Upper-Airway Collapsibility : Measurements and Sleep Effects Chest, July 1, 2001; 120(1): 156 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ono, R. Otsuka, T. Kuroda, E. Honda, and T. Sasaki Effects of Head and Body Position on Two- and Three-dimensional Configurations of the Upper Airway Journal of Dental Research, November 1, 2000; 79(11): 1879 - 1884. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T C Amis, N O'Neill, and J R Wheatley Oral airway resistance during wakefulness in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea Thorax, May 1, 1999; 54(5): 423 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text]