help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huberfeld, S. I.
Right arrow Articles by Scharf, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huberfeld, S. I.
Right arrow Articles by Scharf, S. M.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 152, No. 1, 07 1995, 142-147.

Effect of CPAP on pericardial pressure and respiratory system mechanics in pigs

SI Huberfeld, J Genovese, A Tarasiuk and SM Scharf
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New Hyde Park, New York 11042, USA.

It has been postulated that increased cardiac surface pressure with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) results in decreased left- ventricular (LV) transmural pressure. We tested this hypothesis in seven sedated, unanesthetized, and previously instrumented pigs. We measured pericardial (Pperi), LV, airway (P(aw)), and esophageal (Pes) pressures at CPAP values of 0, 4, 8, and 12 cm H2O before and after blood-volume expansion. With normovolemia, CPAP resulted in an increase in Pperi (from -2.0 +/- 7.6 mm Hg at CPAP 0 to 2.3 +/- 5.6 mmHg at CPAP 12, p < 0.05). Baseline end-diastolic Pperi rose with volume expansion from -2.0 +/- 7.6 mm Hg to 5.4 +/- 5.4 mm Hg, p < 0.05. With hypervolemia, CPAP was associated with a decrease in Pperi (from 5.42 +/- 5.4 mm Hg to 2.3 +/- 5.6 mm Hg, p < 0.05). By contrast, Pes rose equally under both conditions with CPAP. LV transmural end-diastolic pressure (TMEDP) fell significantly under normovolemic conditions (from 16.5 +/- 7.4 mm Hg at CPAP 0 to 13.6 +/- 9.0 mm Hg at CPAP 12). The changes in FRC (pneumotachometry) with CPAP were similar under both conditions. We conclude that the CPAP-induced decrease in LV volume under hypervolemic conditions cannot be explained by an increase in cardiac surface pressure. We present a model to explain the decrease in cardiac surface pressure with CPAP.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J. Juhasz, H. Becker, W. Cassel, S. Rostig, and J-H. Peter
Proportional positive airway pressure: a new concept to treat obstructive sleep apnoea
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2001; 17(3): 467 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
H. E. FESSLER and D. PEARSE
Accuracy of Hemodynamic Measurements during Partial Liquid Ventilation with Perflubron
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2000; 162(4): 1372 - 1376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
J. L Kiely, P. Deegan, A. Buckley, P. Shiels, B. Maurer, and W. T McNicholas
Efficacy of nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy in chronic heart failure: importance of underlying cardiac rhythm
Thorax, November 1, 1998; 53(11): 957 - 962.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1995 American Thoracic Society