help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moler, F. W.
Right arrow Articles by Akingbola, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moler, F. W.
Right arrow Articles by Akingbola, O.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 151, No. 3, Mar 1995, 602-606.

Continuous versus intermittent nebulized terbutaline: plasma levels and effects

FW Moler, CE Johnson, C Van Laanen, JM Palmisano, SZ Nasr and O Akingbola
Department of Pediatrics, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor.

The purpose of this investigation was to compare continuous versus intermittent nebulization of a beta 2-agonist, terbutaline, to determine whether differences exist in plasma concentrations or adverse cardiovascular effects of the drug with these two techniques for its administration. Sixteen children 6 to 16 yr of age, admitted for acute asthma, were enrolled in this randomized double-blind clinical trial. Nebulization of 16 mg of terbutaline over an 8-h period was performed either continuously or intermittently, with a dose of 4 mg given over 20 min every 2 h. The peak plasma terbutaline concentration for the intermittent nebulization treatment (INT) group (5.1 +/- 2.1 ng/ml) occurred 1 h after the fourth inhalation treatment and was similar to the peak concentration for the continuous nebulization treatment (CNT) group, which was reached at the end of the 8 h period (4.7 +/- 2.3 ng/ml). The maximum heart rate increase for the INT group (19.6 +/- 18.3 bpm) occurred 1 h after the fourth dose and was similar to the peak observed in the CNT group (19.6 +/- 19.2 bpm), which occurred after 3 h. Similar increases in systolic and decreases in diastolic pressures were observed for the INT and CNT groups. No evidence of serious adverse myocardial complications was seen in either group, as evidenced by measurements of the MB fraction of creatine phosphokinase (CPK-MB) and Holter-monitor recordings. Continuous nebulization of the terbutaline produces similar plasma concentrations and cardiovascular physiologic responses as intermittent nebulization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
D. R. Hess, F. L. Acosta, R. H. Ritz, R. M. Kacmarek, and C. A. Camargo Jr
The Effect of Heliox on Nebulizer Function Using a {beta}-Agonist Bronchodilator
Chest, January 1, 1999; 115(1): 184 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1995 American Thoracic Society