help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manthous, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, L. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manthous, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, L. D.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 151, No. 1, 01 1995, 210-214.

The effect of mechanical ventilation on oxygen consumption in critically ill patients

CA Manthous, JB Hall, R Kushner, GA Schmidt, G Russo and LD Wood
Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Illinois.

We measured oxygen consumption (VO2) during spontaneous breathing with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), assist control ventilation (AC), and control ventilation during muscle relaxation (AC-MR) in eight patients undergoing resuscitation from cardiopulmonary failure. VO2 decreased in all eight patients between CPAP and AC-MR; mean VO2 (255 +/- 92 ml/min) on CPAP exceeded that on AC-MR (209 +/- 79 ml/min) (p < 0.005). Compared with CPAP, AC without MR reduced VO2 in five of eight patients and mean VO2 (227 +/- 59 ml/min) tended to decrease (p = 0.14); clinical examination did not distinguish patients requiring MR to reduce VO2 further. If VO2 on CPAP approximates VO2 during spontaneous breathing, the difference between CPAP and AC-MR (VO2resp) represents the decrement of VO2 that can be obtained during muscle rest. Both VO2resp and the mechanical work performed by the ventilator on the respiratory system were increased to about five times the efficiencies reported for normal patients, but VO2resp did not correlate with the mechanical work because of a wide range of respiratory muscle efficiencies. These efficiencies are less than those reported in normal patients, which may reflect the effect of sepsis, acidemia, hypoxia, or other conditions in these patients. We conclude that mechanical ventilation with muscle relaxation reduces VO2 by more than 20%; beyond stabilizing pulmonary gas exchange, these interventions preserve limited O2 delivery (QO2) for other vital organs.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. Faisy, E. Guerot, J.-L. Diehl, J. Labrousse, and J.-Y. Fagon
Assessment of resting energy expenditure in mechanically ventilated patients
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2003; 78(2): 241 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. S. Walsh
Recent advances in gas exchange measurement in intensive care patients
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2003; 91(1): 120 - 131.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
G. Dhonneur, C. Cerf, F. Lagneau, J. Mantz, C. Gillotin, and P. Duvaldestin
The Pharmacokinetics of Cisatracurium in Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2001; 93(2): 400 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J. P. KRESS, A. S. POHLMAN, J. ALVERDY, and J. B. HALL
The Impact of Morbid Obesity on Oxygen Cost of Breathing (VO2RESP) at Rest
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 1999; 160(3): 883 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
C. A. Manthous and S. Zarich
Myocardial Ischemia During Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 1998; 2(1): 78 - 89.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1995 American Thoracic Society