help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Desjardins, A.
Right arrow Articles by Malo, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Desjardins, A.
Right arrow Articles by Malo, J. L.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 150, No. 6, Dec 1994, 1714-1717.

Aluminium potroom asthma confirmed by monitoring of forced expiratory volume in one second

A Desjardins, JP Bergeron, H Ghezzo, A Cartier and JL Malo
Department of Chest Medicine, Hopital du Sacre-Coeur, Quebec, Canada.

Chronic airflow obstruction has long been seen among aluminium potroom workers. Currently referred to as "potroom asthma," it is debatable as to whether it is occupational asthma or nonspecific airway obstruction. A 35-yr-old male lifelong nonsmoker, with no history of asthma or atopy, was hired by an aluminium plant that had begun its operation in 1986. Preemployment screening, consisting of spirometry and a chest radiograph, was normal. During his 12-h shifts, he replaced 10 to 20 anodes (prebake type), spending 5 min each time close to open pots releasing hot fumes. The patient experienced episodes of cough and dyspnea, which were resolved during withdrawal from work in January and December 1991. He resumed work in the potrooms in March 1992, his dyspnea recurred at work and at night with 25% drops in peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR), associated with mild-to-moderate bronchial hyperresponsiveness (PC20 histamine, 1.0 mg/ml). After a chest physician's assessment, he was withdrawn from the potroom department. Assessment of the bronchial response to the occupational exposure in potrooms carried out in November 1992 revealed a pattern of dual asthmatic response, paralleled by a drop in PC20 methacholine from 5.1 to 0.7 mg/ml. A similar pattern was seen again during repeat workplace challenges 3 wk later. Spirometry obtained on control days was stable. We conclude that asthmatic reactions can exist among workers in aluminium smelters.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C. E. Mapp, P. Boschetto, P. Maestrelli, and L. M. Fabbri
Occupational Asthma
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 2005; 172(3): 280 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
T Sjaheim, T S Halstensen, M B Lund, O Bjortuft, P A Drablos, D Malterud, and J Kongerud
Airway inflammation in aluminium potroom asthma
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2004; 61(9): 779 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
O. Vandenplas and J-L. Malo
Definitions and types of work-related asthma: a nosological approach
Eur. Respir. J., April 1, 2003; 21(4): 706 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1994 American Thoracic Society