help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahutte, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Holody, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahutte, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Holody, M.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 150, No. 3, 09 1994, 865-869.

Performance of a patient-dedicated, on-demand blood gas monitor in medical ICU patients

CK Mahutte, SA Sasse, PA Chen and M Holody
Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Long Beach, California 90822.

We examined the performance characteristics of a new bedside blood gas monitor. This monitor's fluorescent pH, PCO2, and PO2 sensors are embedded in a cassette, which is calibrated in vitro and then inserted into the patient's radial artery tubing set. In 50 medical ICU patients, 683 paired monitor and conventional blood gas analyzer values were obtained. Performance was assessed via calculations of bias (mean monitor and analyzer difference) and its standard deviation (SD), plots of monitor and analyzer differences against the means (of monitor and analyzer), and linear regression analysis of the sequential changes in monitor values versus the corresponding sequential changes in analyzer values. The ex vivo calibration, assessed using the initial paired blood samples, showed a bias +/- SD of 0.02 +/- 0.02 for pH, -0.1 +/- 1.9 mm Hg for PCO2, and 4.3 +/- 6.0 mm Hg for PO2. For all paired samples (n = 683), the biases +/- SD were 0.004 +/- 0.023 for pH, 0.6 +/- 2.4 mm Hg for PCO2, and 2.7 +2- 6.4 mm HG for PO2. The PO2 bias increased as PO2 increased. The standard deviations (imprecision) of both PCO2 and PO2 also increased as the magnitudes of these variables increased. Sequential changes in monitor values versus the corresponding sequential changes in analyzer values revealed regression lines close to the line of identity. Serum sodium had no effect on pH bias. Daily drift of the sensors was inconsequential, with values of - 0.01/d for pH, 1.7 mm Hg/d for PCO2, and 1.1 mm Hg/d for PO2. We conclude that the performance of this monitor is comparable to that of conventional blood gas analyzers.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
P. Haouzi and B. Chenuel
Control of arterial PCO2 by somatic afferents in sheep
J. Physiol., December 15, 2005; 569(3): 975 - 987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1994 American Thoracic Society