help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jubran, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tobin, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jubran, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tobin, M. J.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 150, No. 3, 09 1994, 766-769.

Use of flow-volume curves in detecting secretions in ventilator- dependent patients

A Jubran and MJ Tobin
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Edward Hines Jr. Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, Illinois 60141.

A noninvasive means of detecting airway secretions in ventilator- dependent patients is desirable because endotracheal suctioning can result in life-threatening complications. In a patient who had copious secretions, we observed a sawtooth pattern on his flow-volume curve that disappeared after suctioning. Accordingly, we systematically examined the usefulness of a sawtooth pattern on flow-volume curves in detecting secretions in ventilator-dependent patients and compared its accuracy with clinical examination. Flow-volume curves were recorded in 50 ventilator-dependent patients over 1 min of spontaneous breathing. In 15 of these patients, clinical examination was performed by three clinicians to determine its accuracy in detection of secretions. Endotracheal suctioning was then performed to determine the presence or absence of secretions. Subsequently, the flow-volume curves of all 50 patients were played back on a video screen, and three observers, who were unaware of the results of suctioning, made a decision regarding the presence or absence of a sawtooth pattern. The sensitivity of the sawtooth pattern in detecting secretions ranged from 0.76 to 0.86, and specificity ranged from 0.86 to 0.90. The likelihood ratio of a positive test ranged from 5.55 to 7.97, whereas the likelihood ratio of a negative test ranged from 0.16 to 0.27. Interobserver agreement, assessed by the kappa statistic, was excellent: 0.76, 0.76, and 0.84. In the subgroup of patients evaluated by both clinical examination and flow-volume curve analysis, clinical examination was less accurate in 11 of the 15 patients. In conclusion, detection of a sawtooth pattern strongly suggests the presence of secretions, and the absence of this pattern suggests that secretions are unlikely to be present.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
S. K. Epstein
Predicting Extubation Failure : Is It in (on) the Cards?
Chest, October 1, 2001; 120(4): 1061 - 1063.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. J. Tobin
Ventilator Monitoring, and Sharing the Data with Patients
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 15, 2001; 163(4): 810 - 811.
[Full Text]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. Guglielminotti, M. Alzieu, E. Maury, B. Guidet, and G. Offenstadt
Bedside Detection of Retained Tracheobronchial Secretions in Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation : Is It Time for Tracheal Suctioning?
Chest, October 1, 2000; 118(4): 1095 - 1099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1994 American Thoracic Society