help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tamm, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wallwork, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tamm, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wallwork, J.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 150, No. 2, 08 1994, 403-407.

Donor and recipient predicted lung volume and lung size after heart- lung transplantation

M Tamm, TW Higenbottam, CM Dennis, LD Sharples and J Wallwork
Department of Respiratory Physiology, Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Lung volumes after heart-lung transplantation (HLT) were recorded and compared with measurements at the time of assessment for surgery and the predicted values for recipients. The influence of donor lung size and recipients' underlying lung disease was evaluated. All patients underwent HLT between April 1984 and April 1991, and only those 82 who survived for at least 6 mo were studied. Mean total lung capacity (TLC) at preoperative assessment was 112% (SD = 28%) of the value predicted for recipients. One month after HLT, mean TLC was 83% (SD = 15%) of the predicted value but increased to 100% (SD = 15%) after 9 mo. No further change in average TLC occurred for 5 yr subsequently. The mean TLC of patients with emphysema before surgery was 164% (SD = 26%) of the predicted value and fell to the predicted value within 1 mo of HLT. The TLC in patients with primary pulmonary hypertension before surgery was close to the predicted value, but postoperative predicted TLC was achieved later than in emphysema patients. A donor-versus-recipient difference in TLC of more than 1L at the time of assessment did not influence the adaptation to the predicted value. FEV1 and vital capacity (VC) rose from means of 70% (SD = 25%) and 63% (SD = 20%) at 1 mo to 96% (SD = 27%) and 91% (SD = 18%), respectively, at 9 mo after HLT. After HLT, TLC returns to the predicted value for the recipient, and not to the preoperative TLC.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
A. Y. Sheikh, M. P. Pelletier, and R. C. Robbins
Heart-Lung and Lung Transplantation
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1579 - 1608.
[Full Text]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
L. B. Balsam, D. D. Yuh, R. C. Robbins, and B. A. Reitz
Heart-Lung and Lung Transplantation
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1461 - 1490.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. Fujita, H. Date, K. Ueda, I. Nagahiro, M. Aoe, A. Andou, and N. Shimizu
Experimental study on size matching in a canine living-donor lobar lung transplant model
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2002; 123(1): 104 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1994 American Thoracic Society