Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 150, No. 1, 07 1994, 233-237.
Reversal of bronchoconstriction by inhaled nitric oxide. Histamine versus methacholine
RH Brown, EA Zerhouni and CA Hirshman
Department of Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.
Using high-resolution CT (HRCT), which measures changes in innervated
airways greater than 1 mm in diameter, we compared the ability of nitric
oxide (NO) to dilate airways preconstricted with histamine and methacholine
in five anesthetized dogs. After the airways were preconstricted, NO was
inhaled in concentrations of 100, 200, and 400 ppm. Additionally, histamine
was given with and without atropine and methylene blue. Data were analyzed
by one-way analysis of variance. Histamine and methacholine decreased
airway area to a similar extent: 60 +/- 3% (mean +/- SEM) and 63 +/- 3% of
control, respectively (p = 0.85). Atropine completely reversed the
histamine-induced constriction (255 +/- 19%). NO also completely reversed
histamine-induced airway constriction in a dose-related fashion. The airway
area went from 60 +/- 3% during histamine infusion to 85 +/- 5, 102 +/- 5,
and 111 +/- 10% of control, respectively (p < 0.01), after doses of 100,
200, and 400 ppm NO. Methylene blue partially inhibited the reversal by 200
ppm NO of histamine-induced constriction. In contrast, NO only partially
reversed methacholine-induced constriction. NO at 100, 200, and 400 ppm
partially attenuated the methacholine-induced airway constriction. Airway
area went from 63 +/- 3 to 67 +/- 3, 75 +/- 3, and 75 +/- 2% of control,
respectively (p < 0.01). We conclude that NO relaxes canine conducting
airways by indirect mechanisms as well as by directly relaxing the airway
smooth muscle.