help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montner, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Chick, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Montner, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Chick, T. W.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 149, No. 6, Jun 1994, 1614-1618.

Hemodynamic effects of nasal and face mask continuous positive airway pressure

PK Montner, ER Greene, GH Murata, DM Stark, M Timms and TW Chick
University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.

Studies of the hemodynamic effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (n-CPAP) in normal subjects have had conflicting results. The largest study (n = 19) found no effect of up to 15 cm H2O on heart rate (HR), cardiac stroke volume (SV), or cardiac index. We hypothesized that n-CPAP, by increasing intrathoracic pressure, should decrease SV and cardiac output (CO) in a dose-dependent fashion in normal subjects. We also hypothesized that mouth position, i.e., open or closed, could affect intrathoracic pressure and thus SV and CO. Six normal subjects were tested with four levels of CPAP (5, 10, 15, and 20 cm H2O) under three mask conditions-face mask and nasal mask with the mouth open (mo) or with the mouth closed (mc). Noninvasive pulsed Doppler measurements of SV and HR were made under each condition. N-CPAP (mc) and face mask CPAP (f-CPAP) resulted in significant dose-dependent decreases of SV-24 +/- 5 ml (21%) and 33 +/- 5 ml (28%), respectively--from baseline to 20 cm H2O (p < 0.05). HR were unchanged and CO significantly decreased with n-CPAP(mc) and with f-CPAP, 1.6 +/- 0.38 L/min (23%) and 2.29 +/- 0.54 L/min (31%), respectively, from baseline to 20 cm H2O (p < 0.05). Esophageal pressure measurements verified increasing intrathoracic pressure with increasing levels of f-CPAP and n-CPAP (mc) but not with n-CPAP (mo). In conclusion, n-CPAP (mc) and f-CPAP resulted in significant and similar dose-dependent decreases in SV and CO.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
A. Valipour, F. Schneider, W. Kossler, S. Saliba, and O. C. Burghuber
Heart rate variability and spontaneous baroreflex sequences in supine healthy volunteers subjected to nasal positive airway pressure
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2005; 99(6): 2137 - 2143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICVTSHome page
Y. Takami and H. Ina
Beneficial effects of bilevel positive airway pressure after surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass
Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, June 1, 2003; 2(2): 156 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S Heindl, C Dodt, M Krahwinkel, G Hasenfuss, and S Andreas
Short term effect of continuous positive airway pressure on muscle sympathetic nerve activity in patients with chronic heart failure
Heart, February 1, 2001; 85(2): 185 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
J. L Kiely, P. Deegan, A. Buckley, P. Shiels, B. Maurer, and W. T McNicholas
Efficacy of nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy in chronic heart failure: importance of underlying cardiac rhythm
Thorax, November 1, 1998; 53(11): 957 - 962.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1994 American Thoracic Society