W van Pelt, GJ Borsboom, B Rijcken, JP Schouten, BC van Zomeren and PH Quanjer
Department of Physiology, Leiden University, The Netherlands.

We compared the age dependence of cross-sectional and longitudinal changes in ventilatory function. FEV1, FVC, and data on chronic respiratory symptoms were obtained from 4,395 adults in a longitudinal survey of normal populations in two different areas in the Netherlands. They participated in up to five surveys at 3-yr intervals between 1972 to 1973 and 1984 to 1985. The ventilatory function in the oldest cohorts is substantially lower than might have been expected from the longitudinal change in the youngest cohorts. This holds for males and females, smokers and nonsmokers, subjects with or without symptoms, and for both survey populations. The robustness of the findings is demonstrated by various data-analytic strategies or omitting one or two of the five surveys from the analysis. Selective loss to follow-up cannot explain the discrepancy. It is concluded that the main differences between our longitudinal and cross-sectional findings may be due to a cohort effect. The implication is that in longitudinal studies of populations at risk, reference equations based on cross- sectional surveys may overestimate longitudinal change and hence lead to underestimating effects of exposure. Similarly, in clinical studies, accelerated decline in ventilatory function may be underrated if it is compared with cross-sectional standards. In older people at any one age the ventilatory function seems to improve in successive birth cohorts.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. A. Minai, J. Benditt, and F. J. Martinez Natural History of Emphysema Proceedings of the ATS, May 1, 2008; 5(4): 468 - 474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Gainet, I. Thaon, V. Westeel, H. Chaudemanche, A. G. Venier, A. Dubiez, J. J. Laplante, and J-C. Dalphin Twelve-year longitudinal study of respiratory status in dairy farmers Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2007; 30(1): 97 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. H. Quanjer, J. P. Schouten, M. R. Miller, and G. Ruppel Avoiding Bias in the Annualized Rate of Change of FEV1 Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 1, 2007; 175(3): 291 - 292. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D M Mannino and K J Davis Lung function decline and outcomes in an elderly population Thorax, June 1, 2006; 61(6): 472 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Fulambarker, A. S. Copur, A. Javeri, S. Jere, and M. E. Cohen Reference Values for Pulmonary Function in Asian Indians Living in the United States Chest, October 1, 2004; 126(4): 1225 - 1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Langhammer, R. Johnsen, A. Gulsvik, T.L. Holmen, and L. Bjermer Sex differences in lung vulnerability to tobacco smoking Eur. Respir. J., June 1, 2003; 21(6): 1017 - 1023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. G. Apostol, D. R. Jacobs Jr., A. W. Tsai, R. S. Crow, O. D. Williams, M. C. Townsend, and W. S. Beckett Early Life Factors Contribute to the Decrease in Lung Function between Ages 18 and 40: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2002; 166(2): 166 - 172. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. M. Vollmer, P. L. Enright, K. L. Pedula, F. Speizer, L. H. Kuller, J. Kiley, and G. G. Weinmann Race and Gender Differences in the Effects of Smoking on Lung Function Chest, March 1, 2000; 117(3): 764 - 772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. J. M. BORSBOOM, W. van PELT, H. C. van HOUWELINGEN, B. G. van VIANEN, J. P. SCHOUTEN, and P. H. QUANJER Diurnal Variation in Lung Function in Subgroups from Two Dutch Populations . Consequences for Longitudinal Analysis Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 1999; 159(4): 1163 - 1171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]