help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chiolero, R.
Right arrow Articles by Revelly, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chiolero, R.
Right arrow Articles by Revelly, J. P.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 149, No. 5, 05 1994, 1118-1122.

O2 consumption by the fick method. Methodologic factors

R Chiolero, P Mavrocordatos, D Bracco, Y Schutz, C Cayeux and JP Revelly
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.

This study aimed to compare O2 consumption (VO2) determination by the gas-exchange (VO2GE) and Fick (VO2F) methods in cardiac surgical patients. A total of 10 mechanically ventilated postoperative patients were studied prospectively. Thermodilution was performed using three randomly applied techniques: room temperature saline injected at end expiration, room temperature saline randomly injected in the respiratory cycle, and iced saline injected at end expiration. The influence of the number of thermodilution determinations was assessed by comparing results from 2 and 10 injections. The variability of VO2F was greater than that of VO2GE. There was no bias between VO2GE and VO2F values using injectate at room temperature. Accuracy and precision were not improved by increasing the number of cardiac output determinations from 2 to 10. A significant bias was observed using ice- cold injectate, VO2F being 18.0 +/- 15.4 ml/min/m2 lower than VO2GE (p = 0.001). Published results when comparing VO2F and VO2GE are discrepant. However, a significant bias was found in all studies using cold injectate, with lower VO2F values. We conclude that iced injectate should not be used to assess VO2 in critically ill patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. W. Schindler, T. W. L. Scheeren, O. Picker, M. Doehn, and J. Tarnow
Accuracy of feedback-controlled oxygen delivery into a closed anaesthesia circuit for measurement of oxygen consumption
Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2003; 90(3): 281 - 290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
R. Salenger, J. S. Gammie, and T. J. Vander Salm
Postoperative Care of Cardiac Surgical Patients
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 439 - 469.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
L. M. MALBOUISSON, C. J. BUSCH, L. PUYBASSET, Q. LU, P. CLUZEL, J.-J. ROUBY, and the CT Scan ARDS Study Gr
Role of the Heart in the Loss of Aeration Characterizing Lower Lobes in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2000; 161(6): 2005 - 2012.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1994 American Thoracic Society
  Membership Renewal