help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahutte, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Sasse, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahutte, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by Sasse, S. A.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 149, No. 4, 04 1994, 852-859.

Development of a patient-dedicated, on-demand, blood gas monitor

CK Mahutte, M Holody, TP Maxwell, PA Chen and SA Sasse
Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Long Beach, CA 90822.

A new monitor (CDI 2000) that brings blood gas measurements to the patient's bedside has been developed. To measure blood gases, blood is drawn into the patient's arterial pressure-monitoring line past in-line fluorescent-based sensors. After measurement, the blood is returned to the patient, avoiding blood loss and delays in sample turnaround and reducing the risk of infection to both patient and operator. We assessed this system's performance in vitro with tonometered bovine blood. Bias (mean difference between monitor and tonometered gas or measured pH values) +/- the standard deviation (SD) were 0.01 +/- 0.02 at pH = 7.39; 0.0 +/- 0.7 mm Hg at Pco2 = 39 mm Hg; and 2.4 +/- 3.2 mm Hg at a Po2 = 100 mm Hg (n = 54). Changes in hematocrit, blood temperature, or serum sodium concentration did not have clinically significant effects on system performance. Studies in normal volunteers, in whom large changes in blood gases were induced, showed a bias (mean difference between monitor and IL 1306 values) +/- SD of 0.00 +/- 0.02 for pH, -0.4 +/- 2.0 mm Hg for Pco2, and -3.6 +/- 7.7 mm Hg for Po2 (n = 69). We conclude from the present study that the performance of this system is comparable to that of conventional blood gas analyzers.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
C Morgan, S J Newell, D A Ducker, J Hodgkinson, D K White, C J Morley, and J M Church
Continuous neonatal blood gas monitoring using a multiparameter intra-arterial sensor
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., March 1, 1999; 80(2): 93F - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1994 American Thoracic Society
  ATS Clinical Skills Tests