help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teschler, H.
Right arrow Articles by Costabel, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Teschler, H.
Right arrow Articles by Costabel, U.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 149, No. 3, Mar 1994, 641-645.

Asbestos fibers in bronchoalveolar lavage and lung tissue of former asbestos workers

H Teschler, KH Friedrichs, GB Hoheisel, G Wick, U Soltner, AB Thompson, N Konietzko and U Costabel
Ruhrlandklinik, Department of Allergy, University of Essen, Germany.

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) provides a simple method of sampling inhaled particles deposited in the lower respiratory tract. We hypothesized that BAL could be used to measure the quantity and quality of lung asbestos burden. This would be true if BAL fluid asbestos fiber content reflected the total content as well as the size distribution of both uncoated and coated asbestos fibers in lung parenchyma. Therefore, we analyzed the asbestos fiber counts of 23 individual sample pairs in both BAL fluid and lung tissue samples obtained from 20 patients with occupational asbestos exposure using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). In addition, fiber type, fiber size, and aspect ratio were compared. Coated asbestos fibers were found in 10 of 23 BAL samples and 16 of 23 biopsies. The mean concentrations of coated asbestos fibers (i.e., asbestos bodies) in BAL and lung parenchyma showed a positive correlation (r = 0.75, p < 0.001). Likewise, the mean amphibole fiber concentrations correlated positively (r = 0.55, p < 0.01). However, there was no relationship between the mean chrysotile fiber counts in BAL and lung parenchyma (r = 0.18, p = 0.40). Asbestos fibers in lung tissue were significantly longer (8.2 +/- 0.5 versus 4.8 +/- 0.6 microns; p < 0.001) but had the same width (0.12 +/- 0.27 versus 0.11 +/- 0.15 microns; p = 0.24) when compared with those retrieved by BAL from the airspace compartment. The aspect ratio (dividing fiber length by width) was much higher in lung tissue than in BAL fluid (66.4 +/- 0.4 versus 42.9 +/- 0.5; p < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
Diagnosis and Initial Management of Nonmalignant Diseases Related to Asbestos
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 15, 2004; 170(6): 691 - 715.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
R. Begin and J. W. Christman
Detailed Occupational History . The Cornerstone in Diagnosis of Asbestos-related Lung Disease
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 2001; 163(3): 598 - 599.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1994 American Thoracic Society