help button home button
AJRCCM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahagnah, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gavriely, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mahagnah, M.
Right arrow Articles by Gavriely, N.

Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 149, No. 2, 02 1994, 477-481.

Repeatability of measurements of normal lung sounds

M Mahagnah and N Gavriely
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa.

The stability of lung sounds measurements over time may influence their clinical usefulness. In the present study we investigated the temporal variability of the spectral pattern of normal lung sounds. Breath sounds from five healthy men were recorded on the trachea and at four locations over the chest wall. Each subject was studied twice with a time interval of 1 wk. On each occasion, measurements were done in duplicate, with a 30-min interval between recordings. Sounds were amplified, band-pass filtered (75 to 2,000 Hz) and digitized into a computer, and the average spectra of the inspiratory, expiratory, and background sounds were calculated. The variability of corresponding spectra were calculated between the daily duplicate (same-day variability, SDV) and between the two recording sessions (between-day variability, BDV). SDV was 32.8 +/- 12.0% during inspiration and 40.8 +/- 12.6% during expiration (p = 0.005). BDV was 36.9 +/- 11.3% during inspiration and 42.7 +/- 12.7% during expiration. These values were not significantly different from SDV except for sounds recorded from the interscapular region (SR). At this location the SDV was 28.2 +/- 7.2% during inspiration and 40.8 +/- 14.2% during expiration, and the BDV was 48.2 +/- 18.7% during inspiration and 77.6 +/- 22.3% during expiration (p < 0.05). The increased BDV at SR was found to be a result of slight differences in microphone position from the first session to the next. Similar changes in microphone position at the other recording sites did not alter the variability of lung sounds.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ThoraxHome page
T M Maher, M Gat, D Allen, A Devaraj, A U Wells, and D M Geddes
Reproducibility of dynamically represented acoustic lung images from healthy individuals
Thorax, June 1, 2008; 63(6): 542 - 548.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
V. GROSS, A. DITTMAR, T. PENZEL, F. SCHÜTTLER, and P. von WICHERT
The Relationship between Normal Lung Sounds, Age, and Gender
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2000; 162(3): 905 - 909.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
Copyright © 1994 American Thoracic Society