Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., Vol 149, No. 2, Feb 1994, 439-443.
Sources of variation in FEV1
AL Coates, KJ Desmond, D Demizio and PD Allen
Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada.
The American Thoracic Society (ATS) recommendations to establish
reproducibility of the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) are
that the value come from "at least 3 acceptable forced expiratory curves"
where "the largest forced vital capacity maneuver (FVC) and the second
largest FVC should not vary by more than 5%." It has been suggested that
there is a "negative effort dependence" of the FEV1 and, alternatively,
that the magnitude of the FVC influences the FEV1. We examined the
relationship between FEV1 and a direct measurement of effort, or work,
defined as the area under the alveolar pressure-volume curve in 1 s.
Thirteen normal individuals and 17 patients with cystic fibrosis or asthma
were instructed to make a series of maximal efforts, as in routine testing.
Comparing the maneuver that resulted in the greatest work to that with the
lowest work, all with FVCs within 5% of one another, there was no
correlation between change in work and change in FEV1 (delta FEV1). There
was a significant relationship between delta FEV1 and changes in FVC (r =
0.49, p < 0.01). The delta FEV1 did not correlate with the degree of
hyperinflation (the FRC) or degree of airflow limitation (the initial
FEV1). The magnitude of changes in FEV1 was small and almost always within
acceptable limits for reproducibility. Because a larger FVC is due either
to an increased inspiration, which could affect the FEV1, or to an
increased expiratory reserve volume, which occurs only after the first
second, these results emphasize the importance of a maximal inspiration at
the start of the test.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Hegewald, M. J. Lefor, R. L. Jensen, R. O. Crapo, S. B. Kritchevsky, C. L. Haggerty, D. C. Bauer, S. Satterfield, T. Harris, and for the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study
Peak Expiratory Flow Is Not a Quality Indicator for Spirometry: Peak Expiratory Flow Variability and FEV1 Are Poorly Correlated in an Elderly Population
Chest,
May 1, 2007;
131(5):
1494 - 1499.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Sharafkhaneh, T. M. Officer, S. Goodnight-White, J. R. Rodarte, and A. M. Boriek
Novel method for measuring effects of gas compression on expiratory flow
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol,
August 1, 2004;
287(2):
R479 - R484.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. L. Enright, K. C. Beck, and D. L. Sherrill
Repeatability of Spirometry in 18,000 Adult Patients
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
January 15, 2004;
169(2):
235 - 238.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. L. Enright, W. S. Linn, E. L. Avol, H. G. Margolis, H. Gong Jr, and J. M. Peters
Quality of Spirometry Test Performance in Children and Adolescents* : Experience in a Large Field Study
Chest,
September 1, 2000;
118(3):
665 - 671.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Dirksen, N.-H. Holstein-Rathlou, F. Madsen, L. T. Skovgaard, C. S. Ulrik, T. Heckscher, and A. Kok-Jensen
Long-range correlations of serial FEV1 measurements in emphysematous patients and normal subjects
J Appl Physiol,
July 1, 1998;
85(1):
259 - 265.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1994 American Thoracic Society
|
|
|